“We commend the Commission and the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight staff for their work in compiling this Preliminary Report. We believe that the Commission should continue on the path laid out in the final rule and reduce the de minimis threshold to $3 billion after the $8 billion phase-in threshold terminates on December 31, 2017. We do not see sufficient evidence in the report to justify either maintaining the current level, or increasing it.”
We strongly support SEC action to improve oversight of potential liquidity issues in open-ended funds, and believe that the proposed rule should be adjusted in a number of ways to better achieve that end.
AFR is calling on financial regulators to provide the public with more transparency on the implementation of the Volcker Rule, the historic prohibition on bank proprietary trading incorporated into the Dodd-Frank Act.
“The undersigned civil rights, consumer, labor, faith, veterans, seniors, and community organizations, strongly urge you to oppose H.R. 4018, the “Consumer Protection and Choice Act.” This harmful bill would limit the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) ability to protect all consumers against high-cost payday, car title, and installment loans… H.R. 4018 would allow the payday industry to avoid federal regulation altogether by pushing an industry-backed proposal based on a Florida law that has proven ineffective at stopping the payday loan debt trap.”
“This week, the Commission faces key decisions in finalizing a crucial protection against derivatives risk, namely the rules governing mandatory provision of margin for derivatives transactions… In this letter, we wish to address one important area of these margin rules, namely requirements for inter-affiliate margin in transactions between swap dealers and affiliated entities. This issue has taken on increased prominence in recent months due to intense lobbying by major Wall Street banks to reduce or eliminate requirements for initial margin in inter-affiliate transactions. “
“We are writing on behalf of the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and Americans for Financial Reform to express our opposition to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)’s recently proposed changes to its discussion of materiality and its guidance regarding how to assess the materiality of disclosures contained in the footnotes of financial statements… Weakening the materiality standard and increasing regulatory deference to issuer and auditor judgments has long been a goal of the preparer community. These efforts have been strongly resisted by investors and investor advocates. It is disappointing, to say the least, to see FASB put forward a proposal that is so clearly intended to advance this anti-investor, anti-transparency agenda.
