Americans for Financial Reform

News Category: AFR in the News

Food & Water Watch: 230+ Groups Call for National Moratorium on New Data Centers

In a letter sent to Congress today, more than 230 national, state and local organizations from across the country called for a full national moratorium on the approval and construction of new data centers. The letter cites massive and unsustainable consumption by data centers of energy and water resources, and skyrocking utility costs for families and small businesses. The letter was facilitated by the national environmental group Food & Water Watch, and signed by organizations including Physicians for Social Responsibility, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Progressive Democrats of America, Our Revolution and Americans for Financial Reform.

Food & Water Watch: 50+ New York Groups Call for Moratorium on New Data Centers

The letter was facilitated by the national environmental organization Food & Water Watch, and signed by national and statewide groups including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Americans for Financial Reform, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Citizen Action of NY, NY Communities for Change, and For the Many.

Congressman Dan Goldman: Rep. Dan Goldman Introduces New Tax On Wealthiest Americans Generating An Estimated $276 Billion In Revenue

Oscar Valdés Viera, Private Equity and Capital Markets Policy Analyst at Americans for Financial Reform, said, “Our tax code shouldn’t reward wealth over work or give billionaires a menu of legal tricks to avoid paying their fair share. Working people pay more as their paychecks increase, but billionaires can live off untaxed borrowings to sidestep their taxes and deepen America’s yawning wealth and racial inequality in the process. The ROBINHOOD Act is an important step toward ending a system that puts wealth over wages and restoring a measure of fairness to our tax code.”

Rolling Stone: Crypto Won Big in 2024. AI Is Angling to Do the Same in 2026

Cryptocurrency expert Mark Hays of Americans for Financial Reform says that attempts to split the difference rarely work. “Some policymakers seem to think that they can have it both ways by conceding to industry interests in return for political support, while saying they also want to protect the public interest. … It’s a shaky bet at best, selling out principles for uncertain return.”