The rule’s most significant failing is that it does not establish a clear uniform best interest standard, one that is no less stringent than that found in the Investment Advisers’ Act, for all professionals who provide investment advice to retail clients. Instead, it adopts a weaker standard for broker-dealers that falls short of a true best interest standard and does not adequately address the conflicts of interest that too often are permitted to taint broker-dealers’ recommendations.
On July 24, 2018, Americans for Financial Reform, the Center for Economic Justice, the Consumer Federation of America, and U.S. PIRG, sent a joint letter to members of the House Committee on Financial Services urging them to vote in opposition to HR 5059, the “State Insurance Regulation Preservation Act”. HR 5059 would create a new
Americans for Financial Reform and ten other organizations sent a joint letter to members of the House Committee on Financial Services urging them to reject H.R. 2570, the Mortgage Fairness Act of 2017.
On July 17, 2018, AFR Policy Director Marcus Stanley offered testimony at a hearing entitled “Examining Capital Regimes for Financial Institutions,” before the Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee.
On July 17, 2018, Americans for Financial Reform and the AFL-CIO sent a letter to Congress recommending a vote in opposition to S. 488 (the “JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2018”), which was being considered on the House floor under suspension of the rules. This legislation does contain several positive elements, and we also
Americans for Financial Reform sent a letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation commenting on a proposal to phase-in the regulatory capital effects of implementing the new Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) accounting methodology. Click here to