This month, Congress has held hearings discussing so-called debanking of crypto firms and a purported golden age of digital assets. The congressional Republicans are doing this to cozy up to the wealthy venture capital and crypto industry donors who claim — without substantive evidence — that regulators pushed banks to deny crypto firms access to banking services because of politics.
Days before taking the oath of office, Donald Trump and his family launched a new cryptocurrency token — known informally as a meme coin — called $TRUMP, as the crypto industry held an inaugural ball. Despite scant details about the coin’s value, use, or risks, trading took off, sending the coin’s price skyrocketing.
Last December, Alex Mashinsky, the founder and former CEO of the crypto lender and trading platform Celsius Network, pled guilty to federal fraud charges and agreed to surrender $48 million in illegal gains from his schemes. Mashinsky admitted he misled customers about the safety of their investment accounts and used their funds to manipulate the price of Celsius’s in-house token.
While the crypto industry is hoping for a more friendly regulatory environment, Mark Hays, associate director for cryptocurrency and financial technology at watchdog group Americans for Financial Reform, warned that there are risks from this.
This week, a chapter closed on one of the more outlandish crypto crimes we’ve seen (which is saying a lot for crypto): a couple of internet influencers pulled off a massive crypto heist that fueled their lavish lifestyle, leading to the Department of Justice’s largest asset seizure in history.
“Almost all of the money that was spent in the elections came from a handful of wealthy donors from Silicon Valley,” said [Mark] Hays, [senior policy analyst] with American for Financial Reform. “They did not come from rank-and-file voters.”
“It means that people are going to be more vulnerable to an industry that is rife with fraud, abuse, market manipulation and cyber-breaches,” said Patrick Woodall, the managing director for policy at Americans for Financial Reform, which advocates for stronger financial regulations. “This is an industry that is extremely volatile, where people take big losses, where market manipulation by insiders is very prevalent.”
Crypto tycoons are storming into U.S. politics and attempting to reshape how we choose our elected officials. And the industry remains mostly controlled by a small group of very wealthy people even though fewer than one-sixth of people have ever owned any cryptocurrency. But crypto tycoons are pouring money into politics, aiming to bypass regulatory oversight, consolidate their power, and restructure American politics for their own benefit.
Cryptocurrency promises a high-tech opportunity to make buckets of money, but like most get-rich-quick schemes, rip-offs are ubiquitous. The crypto industry is rife with scams, hustles akin to stock swindles, cyberbreaches, and other crimes that can easily separate investors and consumers from their money.
The Senate Agriculture Committee is developing legislation aimed at closing the regulatory oversight gap that the cryptocurrency lobby insists is a problem. True, the crypto industry is highly volatile and riddled with scams that expose those that buy cryptocurrencies and tokens to substantial financial losses. But that’s a problem of enforcing existing rules, not regulation. The proposed bill purports to provide regulatory guardrails to this crypto Wild West, but ultimately would give a federal imprimatur to the crypto industry while only offering the patina of the necessary investor and market safeguards needed to protect vulnerable investors.