Category Archives: Letters to Regulators

No Thumbnail

Letter to Regulators: Regulators Must Not Weaken Dodd-Frank Regulations in the Regulatory Review Process

“On behalf of Americans for Financial Reform, we are writing with regard to your current review of bank safety and soundness rules under the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) Notice #4 (December 23, 2015)… Reviewing these rules before they are finalized and while the process of implementation is still ongoing also carries the risk that the burden of implementation will be mistaken for the permanent effects of the rule.”

No Thumbnail

Letter to Regulators: Doing Better by Mortgage Applicants Who Are Not Fluent in English

“Allowing mortgage applicants to choose in which language they are most comfortable in communicating addresses a major problem of lenders and servicers working with limited English proficiency (LEP) populations and collecting this information through the URLA is the most comprehensive way to do so, because every mortgage borrower fills one out.”

No Thumbnail

Letter to Regulators: AFR Supports International Insurance Regulators in Targeting Activities that Create Systemic Risk

“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates this opportunity to comment Public Consultation on Non-Traditional Non-Insurance Activities and Products (the ‘Consultation’) by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (the “IAIS”). We believe that improvements in insurance company regulation are necessary to address such systemic risks. “

No Thumbnail

Letter to Regulators:AFR Submits Comment on the De Minimis Exception to CFTC’s Swap Dealer Registration Threshold

“We commend the Commission and the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight staff for their work in compiling this Preliminary Report. We believe that the Commission should continue on the path laid out in the final rule and reduce the de minimis threshold to $3 billion after the $8 billion phase-in threshold terminates on December 31, 2017. We do not see sufficient evidence in the report to justify either maintaining the current level, or increasing it.”