AFR submitted comments to the Department of Education suggesting ways to ensure that their borrower defense proposal can truly provide a fair and transparent processes for students seeking debt relief following illegal acts by their schools.
Over 10,000 members of Americans for Financial Reform signed a petition calling on the Department to provide full loan relief to defrauded students, provide automatic loan cancellation when there is sufficient evidence of a school’s wrongdoing, not impose time limits on relief for defrauded borrowers, and close gaping loopholes allowing unscrupulous schools to prevent injured students from having their day in court.
AFR joined with the National Consumer Law Center, on behalf of its low-income clients, and 50 other organizations to file a petition today with the Federal Communications Commission urging reversal of its recent Declaratory Ruling in the Broadnet case. The FCC’s ruling allows federal contractors that
“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates this opportunity to comment on the above referenced Proposed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposal”) issued by the Federal Reserve, FDIC, FHFA, NCUA, OCC, and SEC (the “Agencies”)… Section 956 is a particularly significant and vital element of the Dodd-Frank Act. There is widespread agreement among students of the 2008 financial crisis that the design of bonus pay was a central contributor to the crisis. “
“We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule regarding incentive compensation in the financial industry. This proposal is a significant improvement over the 2011 version… However, we remain deeply concerned that loopholes in the regulation will allow a reckless Wall Street bonus culture to continue, putting taxpayers and the broader economy at risk.”
“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates this opportunity to comment on the above referenced Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposal”) by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “Commission”).
“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above mentioned Consultative Document. Among other issues, this Consultative Document proposes to change the measurement of derivatives risk exposures for leverage ratio purposes by replacing the Current Exposure Method (CEM) used today with the Standardized Approach to Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR). The document implies that the SA-CCR has a more realistic approach to risk measurement, while the CEM is more conservative.”
“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) and the Committee for Better Banks (“CBB”) appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) notice of proposed revisions to the Uniform Interagency Consumer Compliance Rating System (“CC Rating System”).”
“We are writing in response to the letter you received recently from a number of industry trade groups opposing the inclusion of preferred language data fields in the redesigned Uniform Residential Loan Application (URLA)… The URLA redesign presents a unique and unprecedented opportunity to take an important first step towards addressing equitable access to the mortgage market for LEP consumers and we strongly urge you to include preferred language data fields.”
“Americans for Financial Reform (“AFR”) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Federal Reserve Board’s (the “Board”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“Proposed Rule” or “Proposal”) on the above-mentioned rule. Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act mandates the imposition of single counterparty credit limits (SCCL), and significantly expands the range of exposures that are captured under such limits. This Proposed Rule is a re-proposal of the Board’s original 2011 proposal regarding credit exposure limits, and makes a number of changes to the original proposal. ”