Comment Letter: Response to CFPB’s Proposals and Questions on Streamlining Regulations
AFR in conjunction with several public interest groups, submitted a comment letter to the CFPB in response to their request for ideas on streamlining regulation.
AFR in conjunction with several public interest groups, submitted a comment letter to the CFPB in response to their request for ideas on streamlining regulation.
Click here to view this week’s highlights and lowlights in Wall Street Reform – February 25, 2012 – March 2, 2012.
Below is a sampling of recent articles that highlight the JOBS Act many flaws and explain why so many different groups and individuals have come out in opposition.
The following letters have been submitted by organizations in opposition to the bipartisan JOBS Act.
Read CFA’s statement on the Senate Banking Committee hearing on the JOBS Act.
Read the letter here.
Read the letter here.
Outpouring of Opposition: In a blog at The Huffington Post (“Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowd(Funding),” March 6, 2012), CFA Director of Investor Protection Barbara Roper documents the broad opposition to the supposedly non-controversial JOBS Act. She points to letters from investor advocates and
Raising Risks: A Wall Street Journal article on a recent Senate Banking Committee hearing (“IPO Skids to Get Greased,” March 6, 2012) quotes U.S. securities regulators, legal experts and others who have raised concerns that the JOBS Act “may expose investors to greater risk” without
Regulations Gutted: A column by Kathleen Pender in the San Francisco Chronicle (“Financial Regulations Gutted in New Bill,” March 11, 2012) asks why Democrats, who supported Dodd-Frank and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, are “solidly backing a bill that would weaken or obliterate many