Letters to Congress: Senate Judiciary Committee should oppose Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court

View or download pdf


Sept 3, 2018


Honorable Members

Senate Committee on the Judiciary

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510


Dear Senators,


On behalf of Americans for Financial Reform, we strongly urge you to oppose the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

Judge Kavanaugh consistently sides with corporations to the detriment of consumers, workers, ordinary Americans and the public interest. His pro-corporate jurisprudence is often far afield from that of his colleagues on the DC Circuit. He notably has the most dissents per year of service on the bench. His views are so extreme that in some instances his conservative colleagues have declined to adopt them.

As an organization focused on consumer financial protection and on the need to properly regulate the financial sector to prevent grave harms to individuals, families, communities, and economic stability, we are deeply concerned about his hostility to consumer protection and to independent agencies. Although the constitutionality of independent federal agencies has long been upheld by the Supreme Court, in 2016, Judge Kavanaugh found that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was unconstitutional because its director is removable by the President only for cause, and not simply because the President desires to remove them. The Supreme Court has long recognized that an independent structure is of tremendous importance in allowing regulators to carry out the law and protect the public without undue influence from political or industry pressures. This independence, for example, has helped the CFPB to be successful in carrying out its consumer protection mandate, which includes returning nearly $12 billion to harmed consumers.

But Judge Kavanaugh showed no respect for this Supreme Court precedent, or for Congressional will – supported by Supreme Court precedent – in establishing an effective and independent agency for consumer protection. His decision in this case was ultimately overruled by a majority of the DC Circuit sitting en banc in a strongly worded opinion, but if he is confirmed as a Supreme Court justice, it could prevail. Both his original decision and his dissent display a radical choice that would leave Americans much more vulnerable to harm by corporate wrongdoers.

This case was not the first time Judge Kavanaugh expressed his disdain towards independent agencies, and only one of many times that he sided with powerful corporate interests against key public protections. In an earlier case regarding the constitutionality of the removal provisions for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, he criticized the long standing Supreme Court precedent upholding them. In other dissenting opinions, he expressed hostility towards Chevron deference, another well established Supreme Court precedent that gives deference to agency decisions when the statute is ambiguous. Chevron deference has played a crucial role in upholding the ability of federal agencies to enact and enforce regulatory protections to safeguard the American people.

Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court would give him ample opportunity to weaken all independent agencies working within their Congressional mandate to protect the public, and thereby leave us all much more vulnerable to predatory practices as well as to actions that put the stability of the entire financial system at risk.

We urge you to oppose his nomination.



Americans for Financial Reform